By courtesy of Dave Kauppi (www.midmarkcap.com) How much is my business worth? That depends. Of course it depends on profits, sales, EBITDA, and other traditional valuation metrics. A surprisingly important factor, however, is how you choose to sell it. If I could share with you how you could realize at least 20% more for your business would you read the rest of this article? The way to achieve the most value from the sale of your company is to get several strategic buyers all competing in a soft auction process. That is the holy grail of company valuation. There are several exit or value options. Let’s examine each one starting with the lowest which is liquidation value. Liquidation Value – This is basically the sale of the hard assets of the business as it ceases to be a going concern. No value is given for good will, brand name, customer lists, or company earnings capability. This is a sad way to exit a business that you spent twenty years building. Book Value – is simply an accounting treatment of the physical assets. Book value is generally not even close to the true value of a business. It only accounts for the depreciated value of physical assets and does not take into account such things as earnings power, proprietary technology, competitive advantage, growth rate, and many other important factors. In case you are working on a shareholder agreement and looking for a methodology for calculating a buy-out, Book value is a terrible metric to use. A better approach would be a multiple of sales or EBITDA. Unsolicited Offer to Buy from a Competitor – This is the next step up in value. The best way I can describe the buyer mindset is that they are hoping to get lucky and buy this company for a bargain price. If the unsuspecting seller bites or makes a weak counter offer, the competitor gets a great deal. If the seller is diligent and understands the real value of his company, he sends this bottom-feeder packing. Another tactic from this bargain seeker it to propose a reasonable offer in a qualified letter of intent and then embark on an exhaustive due diligence process. He uncovers every little flaw in the target company and begins the process of chipping away at value and lowering his original purchase offer. He is counting on the seller simply wearing down since he has invested so much in the process and accepting the significantly lower offer. Buyer Introduced by Seller’s Professional Advisors – Unfortunately this is a commonly executed yet flawed approach to maximizing the seller’s transaction value. The seller confides in his banker, financial advisor, accountant, or attorney that he is considering selling. The well-meaning advisor will often «know a client in the same business» and will provide an introduction. This introduction often results in a bidding process of only one buyer. That buyer has no motivation to offer anything but a discounted price. Valuation From a Professional Valuation Firm – At about the midpoint in the value chain is this view of business value. These valuations are often in response to a need such as gift or estate taxes, setting up an ESOP, a divorce, insurance, or estate planning. These valuations are conservative and are generally done strictly by the numbers. These firms use several techniques, including comps, rules of thumb, and discounted cash flow. These methods are not great in accounting for strategic value factors such as key customers, intellectual capital, or a competitive bidding process from several buyers. Private Equity or Financial Buyer – In this environment of fear, uncertainty, and doubt, the Private Equity Groups are stepping their multiples down for their purchase deals. They still have their roots as financial buyers and go strictly by the numbers, but they have decreased the multiples they are willing to pay. Where three years ago they would buy a bricks and mortar company for 5 ½ X EBITDA, then two years ago they moved that to 7 X EBITDA, and now they are now paying 5 X EBITDA. Strategic Buyers in a Bidding Process – The Holy Grail of transaction value for business sellers is to have several buyers that are actively seeking to acquire the target company. One of the luckiest things that has happened in our client’s favor as they were engaged in selling their company was an announcement that a big company just acquired one of the seller’s competitors. All of a sudden our client became a strategic prized target for the competitors of the buying company. If for no other reason than to protect market share, these buyers come out of the woodwork with some very aggressive offers. This principal holds as an M&A firm attempts to stimulate the same kind of market dynamic. By positioning the seller as a potential strategic target of a competitor, the other industry players often step up with attractive valuations in a defensive posture. Another value driver that a good investment banker will employ is to establish a strategic fit between seller and buyer. The advisor will attempt to paint a picture of 1 + 1 = 3 ½. Factors such as eliminating duplication of function, cross selling each other’s products into the other’s install base, using the sellers product to enhance the competitive position of the buying company’s key products, and extending the life of the buyer’s technology are examples of this artful positioning. Of course, the merger and acquisition teams of the buyers are conditioned to deflect these approaches. However, they realize that their competitors are getting the same presentation. They have to ask themselves, «Which of these strategic platforms will resonate with their competitors’ decision makers?» As you can see, the value of your business can be subjectively interpreted depending on the lenses through which it is viewed. The decision you make on how your business is sold will determine how value is interpreted and can result in 20%, 30%, or even 40% differences in your sale proceeds.
Chinese, Indian, Russian, Brazilian and Middle Eastern investors are interested in buying companies with difficulties. In 2012, private companies, private equity firms, sovereign and investment funds from emerging economies closed acquisitions amounting to $32,600 million (€25,383 million) in developed economies.
The merger and acquisition market is changing. The worldwide capital flow from corporate operations faces a change of 180 degrees. Corporate acquisitions in the USA, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Japan and Canada exceeded $10,000 million (€7,800 million) according to the report “The transaction market reinvents” issued by PwC.
Experts consider that these company acquisitions are not an isolated event. The acquisition of companies with difficulties by investors headquartered in emerging countries is indicating a trend of major transformation of the global M&A market that will reach its peak in the coming years.
The acquirer’s profile from these high-growth markets has also changed. Besides the well-known investors such as sovereign funds and governmental companies, big and medium sized private companies are more and more joining the “acquisition game”. In China for example, private equity firms and other financial investors are showing increased interest in buying European companies. Indian investors have acquired companies for more than $100 million. In Abu Dhabi investors diversify their strategy to reduce their dependence from investments in the USA.
Reasons for buying firms with difficulties:
- New sales channels for their products, services and strengthening of the distribution network. E.g. Wipro Technology Services acquired Science Applications International for $105 million.
- Incorporation of new technology and know-how in order to increase competitive advantages.
- Access to recognized brands in mature economies. E.g. Bright Food (China) acquired the British company Weetabix in order to enter the European food market.
- Change from a regional to a global business. E.g. the North American Entertainment Holding has been acquired by the Asian holding Delian Wanda.